Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30835 (KAR)

DR. SHISHIR SHETTY v. SKODA AUTO VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

WP/17803/2026 · 2026-07-23

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391742026 NC: 2026:KHC:37988-DB WP No. 17803 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 17803 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: DR. SHISHIR SHETTY, SON OF SACHIDANAND SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDENT OF ROSHNI NR. C. V NAYAK HALL, KADRI ROAD MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, KARNATAKA - 575 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIRUDH R.S., ADVOCATE FOR MS. SUSHMA NAGRAJ., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SKODA AUTO VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED., (EARLIER KNOWN AS VOLKSWAGEN GROUP SALES INDIA PVT. LTD) THROUGH ITS CHIEF LEGAL MANAGER HAVING HIS OFFICE AT 14TH AND 15TH FLOOR, COMMERZ II, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK, OBEROI GARDEN CITY, OFF. WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, GOREGAON (EAST), MUMBAI - 400 063. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391742026 NC: 2026:KHC:37988-DB WP No. 17803 of 2026 2. ELITE MOTORS PVT. LTD., VOLKSWAGEN, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 31 DOWNTOWN BANGALORE, MAGRATH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025. 3. VOLKSWAGEN A.G., THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT WERK WOLFSBURG, BRIEFFACH 1470, 38436, WOLFSBURG, GERMANY. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION, SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:15.12.2025 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION IN IA NO.7660/2025 FILED IN REVISION PETITION NO.NC/RP/901/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A OF THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Heard Mr.Anirudh R.S, learned counsel for the appellant in detail. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391742026 NC: 2026:KHC:37988-DB WP No. 17803 of 2026 2. The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed impugning the order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1, at New Delhi in NC/RP/901/2025 along with other IA's on stay, condonation of delay and exemption from filing copies of DIM documents. 3. The NCDRC vide impugned order has condoned the delay of 223 days in filing the revision petition for the reasons stated in the order. The petitioner who is respondent before the NCDRC has come before this Court in the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for being aggrieved by the said order. 4. While delay has been condoned vide detailed order, an interim relief has also been granted by securing the entire decretal amount as awarded by the District Court i.e., a sum of Rs.6,88,567/- together with interest 1 for short 'NCDRC' - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391742026 NC: 2026:KHC:37988-DB WP No. 17803 of 2026 before the District Commission, within a period of one month. 5. We have gone through the impugned order passed by the NCDRC, the impugned order is neither beyond the jurisdiction of the NCDRC nor illegal nor in violation of any provisions of the law. 6. We are exercising only limited jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. We find no reasons to interfere with such a beautifully drafted order passed by the NCDRC. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, however, without costs. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6 ct-vn