1 CGHC010254632026 2026:CGHC:36066 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 912 of 2026 Progressive Construction Limited Through Its Authorized Signatory Suguru Balakrishna Rao, Corporate Office At 7th Floor, Raghava North Block, Raghava Ratna Towers, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hayderabad- Telangana 500001. ... Applicant versus 1 - Pankaj Mohan Kashyap Project Director, Public Works Department, Chhattisgarh Road Development Project, P.I.U., A.D.B. Project, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001. 2 - Satyendra Singh Chahal, Executive Engineer Public Works Department, (B/ R) Kondagaon Division, Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 494226 3 - Sanjay Suryavanshi, Superintending Engineer Public Works Department, (B/ R) Kanker Circle, Kanker, Chhattisgarh 494334 4 - Mukesh Kumar Bansal, Principal Secretary Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002. 5 - V.K. Bhatpahri, Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 492002. ... Respondent(s) For applicant : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Adv. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.08.14 17:13:08 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J) Order on Board 13/08/2026 1 This contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the applicant for non-compliance of order (Annexure C-1) dated 14-11-2025 passed in WPC No. 5936/2025. 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that order under contempt has been complied with and nothing remains in this contempt petition. 3 Learned counsel for the respondents also conceded aforesaid fact. 4 In view of above submission, since the order under contempt has been complied with, therefore, nothing remains in this contempt petition. Hence, the same is disposed of. However, liberty is left with the applicant to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law. 5 The rule issued to respondents is discharged and contempt proceeding is dropped. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak