MD ANUARUL ISLAM @ MD ANARUL ISLAM AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1226/2026 · 2026-07-28
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30831 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30831 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28.07.2026 Serial no. 626 [G.S.D]
CRM (A) 1226 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Ratua PS case o. 200 of 2026 dated 20th February, 2026 u/s 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109(1)/324(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And-
In the matter of : Md. Anuarul Islam @ Md. Anarul Islam & Ors. … Petitioner(s)
Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Ms. Deblina De Ms. Srijani Das
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Krishnendu Bhttachrya, APP Mr. Pritam Roy
… for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Ms. Sagika Banerjee Ms. Sarmistha Basak
… for the O.P. No.2
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the present application has been preferred in order to exert the pressure upon the police authorities in the earlier case being Ratua PS Case No. 71 of 2026. Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, learned APP, appears for the State along with a junior of his choice as per the direction of this court. The appointment of both Mr. Bhattacharya and the junior of his choice, if any, be
2 regularized by the concerned authority. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the defato-complainant also opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the materials in Ratua PS Case No. 71 of 2026. Having considered that the investigation of the case is in progress, so far as the present case is concerned, custodial detention of the present petitioners is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners [Md. Anuarul Islam @ Md. Anarul Islam, Anisur Rahaman, Habibur Rahaman, Md. Anisur Rahaman @ Ansur Rahaman, Md. Arif @ Md. Arif Ekbal] be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
3 As the investigation of the case is in progress, the petitioners shall make themselves physically available before the Investigating Officer of the case within 10 days from date of communication of this order, as also, as and when called for by the I.O. of the case. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1226 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)