IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CWP No.21547 of 2026 Date of decision: July 17th, 2026 Shivcharan Yadav .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Mr. Lakshay Yadav, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that primarily the petitioner is aggrieved with the renewal of Licence No.23 of 2004 which renewal has been granted on 07.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). 2. Learned counsel for the respondents/State has submitted that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of appeal under Section 19 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, whereas in paragraph 13 of the petition, the petitioner has mentioned that there is no other alternate remedy of appeal 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file statutory appeal in accordance with law. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 17th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.17 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh