[2026:RJ-JP:16959] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4944/2026 Ajju S/o Nasihat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Rundhkhoh, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.140/2021 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143 and 382 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsels for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he extorted the complainant’s tractor. It is further submitted that the co-accused Jahid against whom 30 cases have been registered has been granted benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.12.2022. The case of the present petitioner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 11.02.2026 though seventeen cases have [2026:RJ-JP:16959] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4944/2026] been reported against petitioner but co-accused Jahid has been granted benefit of bail against the pendency of the thirty cases. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ajju S/o Nasihat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/23