THANGAMANI SUPPLIERS v. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 1
WP/19873/2026 · 2026-06-09
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30809 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30809 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 19873 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19873 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.21210 of 2026 Thangamani Suppliers Rep by its proprietor P.Samuvel, S/o.Pennymeen, No. 10, MGR Nagar, Venkat Raman Salai,K.K. Nagar, Chennai-600 078 ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 K.K.Nagar Assessment circle No.1, Greams road, Annex building 5th floor PAPJM Building, Chennai-600 006
2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Chennai Central-I, Chennai ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st Respondent in FORM GST DRC-07 vide Ref. No. ZD331125454765B/2021- 2022 dated 26.11.2025 in connection with detailed order in GSTIN No. 33BZQPS8401P3ZI/2021-2022 dated 26.11.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Chinnasamy V For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19873 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 26.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19873 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To
1.
The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 K.K.Nagar Assessment circle No.1, Greams road Annex building 5th floor PAPJM Building Chennai-600 006
2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Chennai Central-I, Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19873 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19873 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.21210 of 2026 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis