1 CGHC010286922024 2026:CGHC:37705 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 139 of 2024 Tapan Kumar Das S/o Late Ramratan Das Aged About 70 Years R/o Bakultara Lane, Post Ichapur, Nawabganj, District 24 Pargana North, (West Bengal) --- Petitioner versus 1 - Manager, State Bank Of India Branch Sector 1, Bhilai Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Manager Central Bank Of India, Branch Civic Center Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - M/s Sjhri Ram Investment Transport Fi. Com. Ltd New Civic Center, Near Geet (Meraj) Talkies Bhilai) Tehsil And Disrtrict Durg Chhattisgarh Present Registered Office Chennai (Tamilnadu), Through Manager Local Office, Shop No. 17, 2nd Floor, Chauhan Estate, Supela, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Prabodh Kumar Bagh S/o J.K.Bagh Aged About 47 Years R/o Tanki Maroda Bhilai Nagar, P.O.Civic Center, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - General Public Bhilai Tanki Maroda, Bhilai Nagar, P.O. Civic Center Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. S.A. Ansari, Adv. For respondent No. 2 : Ms. Shivali Dubey, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Anand Shukla, Adv. For respondent No. 3 : Ms. Priyanka, Rai, Adv. For respondents No. 4 : Ms. Ankita Gowsami, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Patel, Adv. 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 21-8-2026 1. The applicant has preferred this civil revision under Section 384(3) of the Indian Succession Act against the order (Annexure A-1) dated 30- 7-2022 passed by the 1st Civil Judge Class 1, Durg in Succession Case No. 28/2016 and order (Annexure A-2) dated 9-7-2024 passed by the 4th District Judge, Durg in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 58/2022. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 would submit that, respondent No. 4 Prabodh Kumar Bagh had filed Civil Suit No. 283/2016 (Prabodh Kumar Bagh Vs. Tapan Kumar Das and ors.) before 4th Civil Judge Junior Division, Durg seeking declaration on the basis of Will executed by late Ravindra Nath Sinha in his favour in respect of subject amount, which has been decreed in favour of Prabodh Kumar Bagh vide judgment and decree dated 20-9-2024. She also filed copy of the same which is taken on record. 3. In view of above judgment and decree passed by learned trial Court, this revision is dismissed having become infructuous. 4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.08.24 17:12:52 +0530