AKASHDEEP SINGH MINOR THROUGH HIS MOTHER MANJIT KAUR v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/20987/2026 · 2026-07-14
Pankaj Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-20987-2026 1 145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20987-2026
Date of decision : 14.07.2026 AKASHDEEP SINGH MINOR THROUGH HIS MOTHER MANJIT KAUR
....Petitioner Versus FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Pakka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.8.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 12.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab whereby revision petition filed at the behest of petitioner under Section 16 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 against the instrument of partition dated 01.03.2021, has been dismissed.
2. The only grievance raised by the petitioner is based upon Annexure P-9. As per which, the petitioner claims that prior to partition, he was in possession of land shown in Red colour, but after partition he has been dispossessed from part thereof and he has been granted possession DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.17 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-20987-2026 2 depicted in Yellow Colour in naksha beh which has been placed on record at Page 43.
2.1. As per mode of partition, the parties being co-sharers almost to the extent of 1/3rd share each, were to be adjusted and given equal share in valuable land which abuts the road. In order to achieve the same naksha beh has been finalized which is being reproduced herein-below:
3. Keeping in view that no prejudice has been caused to the petitioner and he has been given 1/3rd share on the front side land abutting DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.17 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-20987-2026 3 the road even though one karam less, this Court finds no reason to annul the partition which is fair and equitable. Resultantly, finding no merit in the present writ petition, the same is ordered to be dismissed. July 14, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr
Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.17 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document