Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3080 (JHR)

NIRANJAN KUMAR PASWAN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1130/2026 · 2026-04-07

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9772 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1130 of 2026 ------ Niranjan Kumar Paswan, son of Balo Ram, resident of Village Harli, P.O. and P.S. Badkagaon, District Hazaribag, presently residing at Babugaon, near Mennat Gali, P.O. and P.S. Koraha, District Hazaribagh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/07.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar (Chatra) P.S. Case No. 268 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 341 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the charge sheet has been submitted against the principal accused, Keshav Kumar Rangila and his father Khemraj Prasad and now the petitioner has received notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner happens to be accomplice of other co- accused persons and the allegations are thereof taking money for providing job of Orderly at Civil Court, Chatra. 5. Considering that the petitioner has received notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and if the regular bail petition is filed by the petitioner before the Court, the learned Court shall dispose of the same without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 09.04.2026