HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17444 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State respondents no. 1 to 3 and Sri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5. 2. Learned standing counsel has raised preliminary objection and submitted that disputed question of fact cannot be decided by this Court and the petitioners are having remedy to approach the competent court of law. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not disputed the aforesaid fact. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent court of law, if so advised. May 5, 2026 Arif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., M.J. Akhtar (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Buddha Bhagwan Mandir Mahaparinirvar Mahabihar Trust And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad