CWP-13963-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-13963-2026 Date of decision : 16.07.2026 Om Parkash ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A. G. Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to finalize the allotment of the plot measuring 14 marla in view of the letter dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) and scrutiny list (Annexure P-6). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the entire land of the petitioner was acquired in the year 1990 and as per the policy of the State Government, since no land was left with the petitioner, thus, he was entitled to 14 marla plot. It is further submitted that the petitioner applied for the plot in the year 2018 but till date no plot has been allotted to the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner had repeatedly represented to the respondent authorities and has also given application dated 01.02.2026 to the Estate Officer, HSVP, Gurugram and at this stage, he DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.17 16:54 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-13963-2026 2 would be satisfied in case the Estate Officer, HSVP, Gurugram considers and decides the said application in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel has submitted that the application dated 01.02.2026 would be decided by the Estate Officer within a period of three months from today and in case the application is found to be meritorious, then, necessary action in accordance with law would be taken as expeditiously as possible. 4. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Estate Officer, HSVP, Gurugram, to consider and decide the application dated 01.02.2026 (Annexure P-7) filed by the petitioner within a period of three months by passing a speaking order after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his legal representative and in case the plea of the petitioner is found to be meritorious, then, to grant relief to the petitioner in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits of the case and the application would be considered independently in accordance with law by the Estate Offficer, HSVP, Gurugram. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 16, 2026. JUDGE Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.17 16:54 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment