Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3079 (UTT)

DHARMENDRA MAURYA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/97/2026 · 2026-03-25

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:2147 BA1 No.97 of 2026 Dharmendra Maurya Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Abhishek Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.228 of 2025 dated 02.11.2025 under Section 22, 29, 60 and 8 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Lalkua, District Nainital. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that so far as grounds of arrest are concerned, there is no independent eye witness. He submits that applicant’s wife is pregnant and required association of her husband and applicant is the only bread earner of the family; he has no criminal history; he is languishing in jail since 02.11.2025. 6. Learned State counsel has strongly opposed the bail application. 7. Without expression any opinion on the final merits of the case and considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Dharmendra Maurya be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 25.03.2026 Arti