Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3078 (BOM)

PARVEZ MOHAMMED MURTAZA ALAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/1684/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

56-IA-1684-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1684 OF 2026 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.839 OF 2025 Parvez Mohammed Murtaza Alam ...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Barsawade Shreyas Purshottam, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 7th JULY, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2. By this application, the Applicant is praying to relax the condition of providing local surety. 3. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that Applicant is ready to provide surety from Pune and Nashik Districts. 4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Applicant, I pass following order: ORDER (i) Interim Application is allowed. (ii) The condition imposed on the applicant to provide local surety VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.07.13 11:05:06 +0530 56-IA-1684-2026 (CR).doc Tikam is hereby relaxed. (iii) The Applicant is permitted to provide one or two surety from Pune or Nashik District. (iv) Interim Application is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)