IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 338 CRM-M-17845-2026 Date of Decision:-14.07.2026 RESHAM SINGH AND OTHERS ......PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Amitoj Singh Dahilwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kuljinder Dhindsa, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J.(ORAL ) 1. The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (Section 528 BNSS, 2023) is for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 03.12.2025 (Annexure P-11) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moga vide which the petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders in FIR No.336 dated 27.11.2014 under Sections 450, 325, 323, 34IPC, Act No.45 of 1860 (corresponding Sections 332(b), 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) BNS, Act No.45 of 2023) registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga, Punjab. 2. On 06.04.2026, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.PC ( Section 528 BNSS, 2023) is for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 03.12.2025 (Annexure P- 11) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moga vide which the petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders KUSUM 2026.07.15 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-17845-2026 -2- in FIR No.336 dated 27.11.2014 under Sections 450, 325, 323, 34 IPC, Act No.45 of 1860 (corresponding Sections 332(b), 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) BNS, Act No.45 of 2023) registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga, Punjab. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are ready and willing to join the proceedings. Notice of motion for 14.07.2026. Subject to deposit of Rs.50,000/- collectively with Punjab and Haryana High Court Employees Welfare Association, A/c No.37167209613, State Bank of India, High Court Branch, Chandigarh, IFSC Code:SBIN0050306, operation of the impugned order dated 03.12.2025 (Annexure P-11) shall remain stayed. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction by way of an application seeking bail.” 3. The petitioners have not complied with the aforementioned order. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed. 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 14.07.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.15 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh