Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3077 (UTT)

RAHMAN QURESHI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/69/2026 · 2026-03-25

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

xSL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 69 of 2026 With WPCRL No. 91, 114, 125, 127,130 and 133 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner in WPCRL No. 69, 125 & 133 of 2026. 2. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner in WPCRL No. 114 of 2026 3. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 4. Learned counsel for the parties submits that all these writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly, in view of the statement of learned counsel for the parties, all writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.03.2026 Nahid