Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30769 (PNJ)

NARINDER KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/10891/2026 · 2026-07-17

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-10891 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-10891 of 2026 (O&M) Date of decision : July 17, 2026 Narinder Kumar Jain ...... Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL *** Present :- Mr. Sandeep Sharma , Advocate and Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam Gupta, Advocate for HSIIDC. Ms. Archana Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to Respondents to release him compensation along with interest for ARCHANA ARORA 2026.07.17 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10891 of 2026 (O&M) 2 structures as directed by Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’) vide supplementary Award dated 10.09.2021 (Annexure P-2). 2. The respondents vide notifications dated 31.12.2013 and 14.08.2018 issued under Sections 4 and 6 respectively, acquired land measuring 7 Kanal 19 Marla situated in village Dharuhera for development of Mass Rapid Transport System & Allied Use, an early bird project under the Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) Project in Urban Estate Gurugram. A supplementary award dated 10.09.2021 was passed whereby compensation was assessed @ Rs 1,01,60,986/-. Petitioner moved representation dated 05.03.2026 to disburse the amount of compensation but to no avail. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents who on advance notice, is present in Court submits that due amount of compensation would be released within six weeks from today. She further submits that respondents may be directed to hand over possession of the acquired land. 4. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that possession has already been taken over by respondents. Nevertheless, if any part of the acquired land is in the possession of petitioner, it would be handed over to respondents before collecting payment. 5. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the respondents, present petition is disposed of. ARCHANA ARORA 2026.07.17 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10891 of 2026 (O&M) 3 6. Parties would be at liberty to move an appropriate application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India before this Court, if the other side does not comply with statement. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE July 17, 2026 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No ARCHANA ARORA 2026.07.17 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document