MRS. GITA ABRAHAM v. THOMAS ABRAHAM SINCE DIED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS
WP/7889/2023 · 2026-07-21
Vijaykumar A Patil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30767 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30767 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010178072023 NC: 2026:KHC:37539 WP No. 7889 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7889 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
MRS. GITA ABRAHAM D/O LATE KUREEKATTIL ABRAHAM W/O ABARAHAM VERGHESE AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.202, ORCHIDS APARTMENTS, 28 LINE ROAD, COOKE TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C, ADVOCATE) AND:
THOMAS ABRAHAM SINCE DIED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS
1.
MRS.SHEREEN ANNIE ABRAHAM W/O LATE THOMAS ABRAHAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.32/9, SPENCER ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 085.
2.
JOHNEY ABRAHAM S/O LATE KUREEKATTI ABRAHAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010178072023 NC: 2026:KHC:37539 WP No. 7889 of 2023
3.
THOMAS ABRAHAM S/O JOHNEY ABRAHAM AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT NO.21/1, NORTH ROAD, OPP TO WINDERMERE APARTMENT, COOKE TOWN, ST.THOMAS TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.B. AJITH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 AND R3;
SRI. J. HUDSON SAMUEL, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN OS. NO.3726/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-70), AT BENGALURU AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010178072023 NC: 2026:KHC:37539 WP No. 7889 of 2023
2. The memo reads as under:
"The undersigned advocate for the petitioner herewith submits that the parties have reached for amicable settlement and decided to file compromise petition before the Trial Court in O.S.No.3726/2021. It is submitted that since the proceedings before the trial Court are stayed, it is just and necessary to dispose off the above petition, to enable the parties to file the Compromise Petition before the Trial Court. In view of the said arrangement, the petitioner is intended to withdraw the above petition as not pressed."
3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18