IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2058 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Kalam @ Mohammad Kalam Md. Hashim @ Md. Hasim Resident of Village - Surtipatili, Surtipatti, Ward No. 01, Police Station - Supaul, District - Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 334(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 29.01.2025 at 05:45 A.M. as the informant reached near Kali Mandir for offering the prayer, he saw two locks on the ground. The temple was open. When he entered in the temple he saw that silver mukut, chain and other jewellery of the deities were missing. It is further alleged that Rs.55,000/- in cash were stolen by the unknown miscreants. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2058 of 2026(2) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 investigation one Vikay Mian @ Md. Hazrat has given his confessional statement and the name of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement. It has been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that save and except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2025. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail and has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Birpur, Supaul. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T