Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3076 (JHR)

MRS. SARITA KATARUKA v. R.R.D.A. And ORS

WPC/1225/2007 · 2026-04-07

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:9698 ) -1- W.P. (C) No. 1225 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1225 of 2007 Mrs. Sarita Kataruka, wife of Sri Dilip Kataruka, resident of Lake Avenue, Kanke Road, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Gonda, District- Ranchi … Petitioner -Versus- 1. Ranchi Regional Development Authority, through its Chairman, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 2. Vice-Chairman, Ranchi Regional Development Authority, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 3. Secretary, Ranchi Regional Development Authority, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 4. Ranchi Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Commissioner, having its office at Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town and District- Ranchi … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahato, Advocate Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate Mr. Shivam Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Oishi Das, Advocate Mr. Roshan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the R.R.D.A. : Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate Mrs. Pinky Shaw, Advocate For the R.M.C. : Mr. L.C.N. Shahdeo, Advocate ----- 14/07.04.2026 Heard Mr. Rohit Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-R.R.D.A. and Mr. L.C.N. Shahdeo, learned counsel for the respondent-R.M.C. 2. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.06.1999 passed by respondent no.2 in U.C. Case No.40 of 1999 under the Ranchi Regional Development Authority Act. 3. This writ petition is of the year 2007 and subsequently the business of Ranchi Regional Development Authority has been transferred to Ranchi Municipal Corporation in the year 2011 and now the dispute is coming within the domain of Ranchi Municipal Corporation. ( 2026:JHHC:9698 ) -2- W.P. (C) No. 1225 of 2007 4. Mr. L.C.N. Shahdeo, learned counsel for the respondent-R.M.C. on instruction submits that subsequently master plan has also been revised and in view of that, the petitioner can move before the authority of Ranchi Municipal Corporation for redressal of her grievance. 5. In view of the above, Mr. Rohit Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will go before the authority concerned by way of filing detailed representation and the authority may kindly be directed to take a decision on her representation in accordance with law. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition is being disposed of directing the petitioner to file a detailed representation pointing out her grievance before respondent no.4 and respondent no.4 will take a final call on the said representation as per recent master plan within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 7th April, 2026 Ajay/