IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 Priti Yadav State of Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Articles 226 nature of Certiorari which was issued by respondent No. 2, whereby candidature of the petitioner has been rejected ille 2. through Video Conferencing submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. 3. 4. 16.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Priti Yadav Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the Certiorari for quashing the list dated 12.08.2024 (Annexure P which was issued by respondent No. 2, whereby candidature of the petitioner has been rejected illegally. At very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conferencing submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20040-2024 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the list dated 12.08.2024 (Annexure P-5) which was issued by respondent No. 2, whereby candidature of the petitioner t very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conferencing submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No under of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the 5) which was issued by respondent No. 2, whereby candidature of the petitioner t very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conferencing submits that the instant writ petition has been RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.17 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.