Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3075 (HP)

NHAI v. RAMESH SINGH AND OTHERS

OMPM/167/2024 · 2026-04-16

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

National Highway Authority of India  Vs  Ramesh Singh and others Arb. Appeal No. ______ of 2026 16.04.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant­appellant. Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. OMPs(M) No. 389 of 2025 and 435 of 2025 The   applicant   has   filed   OMP(M)   No.   389   of 2025, under Order 22 Rules 4 & 9 read with Section 151   CPC,   to   bring   on   record   the   LRs   of   deceased respondent No. 2, who, as per the application, expired on 17.12.2024, after condoning the delay in filing the OMP (M) No. 389 of 2025. In view of the no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents, including the proposed LRs of   deceased   respondent   No.   2,   applications   under consideration   are   allowed   and   the   proposed   LRs   of deceased respondent No. 2 are ordered to be brought on record as LRs 2(a) to 2(c), after condoning the delay in filing the application.   Applications stand disposed of. OMP(M) No. 167 of 2024 2. Mr.   Yuyutsu   Singh   Thakur,   learned   counsel appears on behalf of newly added respondents No. 2(a) to 2(c).  Service complete. 3. In view of the no objection made by learned counsel   for   the   respondents,   the   application   under consideration   is   allowed   and   the   delay   in   filing   the appeal is ordered to be condoned.   Application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No. ______ of 2026 4. Vide order of the even date passed in OMP(M) No. 167 of 2024, delay in filing the appeal has been ordered to be condoned. 5. Service complete. 6. Enabling the learned counsel for the appellant to file fresh memo of parties, in pursuance of the order of the even date passed in OMP(M) No. 389 of 2025, list after ten days. OMPST No. 33434 of 2024 7. Application is considered and allowed.  During the pendency of the appeal, the execution of the award dated 22.06.2018, in Case No. 26 of 2014, passed by the   learned   Arbitrator­cum­Divisional   Commissioner, shall remain stayed, subject to the condition that the applicant   shall   deposit   the   entire   awarded   amount, along with up­to­date interest, within a period of eight weeks, from today.  The application stands disposed of. Modification/alteration/vacation on motion. ( Virender Singh ) Judge 16th April, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)