SHARIF MUMTAZ KHAN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS
WP/4163/2026 · 2026-06-25
Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3075 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3075 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
907-wp-4163-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4163 OF 2026 Sharif Mumtaz Khan And Anr .. Petitioners V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary and Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4164 OF 2026 Zaheer Mohd Sharif Khan .. Petitioner V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary and Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4165 OF 2026 Aqeel Sharif Khan .. Petitioner V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary and Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4166 OF 2026 Mohd Sayeed Mohd Sharif Khan .. Petitioner V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary and Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4167 OF 2026 Zahid Husain Riyazullah Khan .. Petitioner varsha 1 of 4 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2026.06.25 17:46:31 +0530
907-wp-4163-2026.doc V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary .. Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4168 OF 2026 Danish Ahmad Mohd. Jafar Shaikh .. Petitioner V/S. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4169 OF 2026 Bushra Fatima Rizwan Ahmed Qadri .. Petitioner V/S. The State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary And Ors .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4170 OF 2026 AB Aziz Saukat Ali Shaikh .. Petitioner V/S. The State of Maharashtra Thro. Its Principal Secretary .. Respondent ------------------- Mr. Atharva Dandekar with Gautam Jain and Ashmita Goradia, for the petitioners. Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP, for the State in WP/4163/2026. Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP, for the State in WP/4164/2026 Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP, for the State in WP/4165/2026 Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Addl. G.P. with D.S. Deshmukh, AGP, for the State in WP/4166/2026 Ms. P.M.J. Deshpande, AGP, for the State in WP/4167/2026 varsha 2 of 4
907-wp-4163-2026.doc Ms. Pooja Patil, AGP, for the State in WP/4168/2026 Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. G.P. with V.R. Raje, AGP, for the State in WP/4169/2026 Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP, for the State in WP/4170/2026. Adv. Tanu Bhatia, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3-Corporation. -------------------- CORAM :
MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE :
25TH JUNE 2026. PC:
1. The Petitioners in these petitions filed these writ petitions apprehending the demolition of their structures in the light of road widening exercise proposed to be undertaken by the respondent- Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation. 2.
It appears that these petitions were heard for some time before a coordinate bench when it was indicated that the said Municipal Corporation would be ready to issue reasonable notice to the petitioners before taking any coercive steps in the matter. Recently, the Municipal Corporation has e-filed undertakings in these petitions specifically stating that the said Municipal Corporation undertakes that no action shall be taken in respect of the subject premises pertaining to these Writ petitions or any part thereof without giving prior notice of two weeks (15 days) to the petitioners. 3. The undertakings have been e-filed. Registry to verify and ensure that the undertakings are on record. 4. In any case, the learned counsel appearing for respondent- varsha 3 of 4
907-wp-4163-2026.doc Municipal Corporation has tendered original undertakings on affidavits in these writ petitions. The same are taken on record of the respective writ petitions. 5. In the light of the specific undertakings given by respondent- Municipal Corporation, the apprehension expressed by the petitioners is sufficiently addressed and therefore, nothing really survives in these Writ petitions. The undertakings given on behalf of the respondent- Municipal Corporation shall be treated as undertakings given to this Court. 6. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. 7. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) varsha 4 of 4