1 CGHC010262152026 2026:CGHC:36157-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 728 of 2026 Bhanupratappur Parivahan Sangh Through Its President- Gurdeep Singh Dhindsa (Wrongly Mentioned As Gurdeep Singh Dheedhsa In The Impugned Order Dated 04-06-2026, Passed In Wpc No. 2790/2026), S/o Late Shri Harjot Singh Dhindsa, Aged About- 50 Years, Bhanupratappur Parivahan Sangh, Dalli Road, Bhanupratappur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.)- 494669 ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Registrar Firms And Society State Of Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Uttar Bastar Kanker District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4. Superintendent Of Police Uttar Bastar Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5. Assistant Registrar Firm And Societies Hall No. 21, Second Floor, Sanyukt Jila Karyalaya Bhawan, Collectorate, Jagdalpur, District- Jagdalpur (C.G.) 6. Station House Officer Police Station- Bhanupratappur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 7. Sub Divisional Officer (Police) Bhanupratappur, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.14 18:54:10 +0530 2 8. Harcharan Singh Randhawa S/o Late Mahendra Singh Randhawa Aged About 53 Years R/o Village- Chougil, Dallirajhara Road, Near New Iti, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.)- 494669 9. Paramjit Kaur Randhawa W/o Harcharan Singh Randhawa Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Chougil, Dallirajhara Road, Near New Iti, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.)- 494669 10. Sub-Divisional Office (Revenue) Bhanupratappur, District- Uttar Bastar (Kanker) (C.G.)(Since The Respondent No. 10 Was Not A Party In The Writ Petition, But The Respondent No. 10 Is Acting Under The Command Of Collector Uttar Bastar Kanker By Issuing Memo Dated 09-06-2026 (Filed As Annexure A/3), In Furtherance Of Impugned Order Dated 04-06-2026 Passed In Wpc No. 2790/2026 (Annexure A/1). So This Is How, The Respondent No. 10 Is Arrayed As Party Before This Hon'ble Court. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 14 .08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Surfaraj Khan, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State. 3 2. The present intra-Court appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 04.06.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No. 2790 of 2026 (Harcharan Singh Randhawa & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition filed by respondents No. 8 and 9 herein. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant herein was respondent No. 8 in the aforesaid writ petition. Though the appellant was impleaded as respondent No. 8 in the writ petition, he was not afforded an opportunity of hearing before the learned Single Judge. Learned counsel for the appellant, therefore, submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to take recourse to an appropriate remedy before the learned Single Judge. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for, to the appellant to take recourse to an appropriate remedy before the learned Single Judge. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan