Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30737 (PNJ)

KARAMJIT KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/28249/2026 · 2026-07-14

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-28249-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 318 CRM-M-28249-2026 Date of decision: 14th July, 2026 Karamjit Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. J.S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No. 08 dated 11.02.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Sandaur, District Malerkotla and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 27.10.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 18.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28249-2026 -2- 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Malerkotla and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 16.06.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 08 dated 11.02.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Sandaur, District Malerkotla and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 27.10.2025(Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 14th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.15 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document