IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (288) CRM-M-14324-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 SUKHDEV SINGH @ SONU AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the petitioners. As per order dated 08.04.2026, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to amend the petition by mentioning Section 201 of IPC. Thereafter, they sought another adjournment but the order was not complied with. Today none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the petition. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant petition on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document