Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30721 (KAR)

SRI PRUTHVI RAJ S v. M/S FINE SANDS LLP

CRL.RP/746/2026 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA & SMT. SOHANI HOLLA, MEMBER CRL.RP No.746/2026 (Lok Adalat No.1648/2026) BETWEEN SRI. PRUTHVI RAJ S S/O SHANKAR P M/S PRUTHVI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS NO.6/5, BILAVADRAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 500 083. R/AT NO.37, 2ND CROSS, OPP. ANJANEYA TEMPLE, JAMBUSAVARI DINNE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMAKRISHNA A.V., ADVOCATE) AND M/S FINE SANDS LLP SY.NO.101/3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, BAGALUR ROAD, Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 VENKATESHWARAPURAM VILLAGE, SHULAGIRI TALUK, KRISHNAGIRI T TAMIL NADU - 560 083. REPTD. BY ITS PARTNER, SRI.B.SRINIVAS REDDY ALSO: BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.30/25A, TIRUPALYA, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 105. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BHAT GANAPATI NARAYANA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.02.2026 PASSED BY THE LXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY IN CRL. APPEAL NO.1468/2024 (CCH-69) AND ALSO JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 03.08.2024 PASSED BY THE XXV ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.27459/2022, BY ALLOWING THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FROM CONVICTED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT. 3 THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Parties are present along with their respective counsels. 2. Joint memo is filed signed by revision petitioner and respondent and their respective counsels. 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that if the amount as agreed in the joint memo is not paid, accused/revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 5. It is agreed that after payment of the amount as agreed in the joint memo, sentence of imprisonment stands set aside. 4 6. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant/respondent under due identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MR List:2, Sl.No.58