Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30719 (KAR)

RATHNAMMA v. SRI. MUNISH MOUDGIL I.A.S

CCC/1094/2025 · 2026-07-21

K S Hemalekha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558622025 NC: 2026:KHC:37405-DB CCC No. 1094 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1094 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. PADMA W/O PARAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. VIJAYA KUMAR B S/O VALLUMALAI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 4. K BALU S/O KUPPUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 5. JAYAMMA H.C. W/O SINGARI GOWDA H.K. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 6. SHOBHA V W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY N AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558622025 NC: 2026:KHC:37405-DB CCC No. 1094 of 2025 7. SUJATHA W/O MUDDURAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT BEHIND SRS ASHRAYA NAGAR, PEENYA 1ST STAGE BANGALORE - 560 058 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI MUNISH MOUDGIL, I.A.S. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 …ACCUSED 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH, AGA FOR PRO FORMA RESPONDENT No.2 & ACCUSED No.1) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, SINCE HE HAS FAILED TO OBEY AND IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2025 IN W.P. NO.4748/2025 (KLR-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-D THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558622025 NC: 2026:KHC:37405-DB CCC No. 1094 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainants have filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 07.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.4748/2025 (KLR-RES). The complainants had filed the said petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the State Government and the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District to pass appropriate orders in terms of the recommendations dated 22.07.2022 in respect of grant of land in favour of the complainants. 2. The complainants had stated that the concerned Tahsildar had recommended that 3 acres and 20 guntas of land comprising in Sy.No.70, Kittanahalli Village, Dasanapura Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk be reserved for the purpose of allotting sites to persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and backward classes. The said recommendations had been forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner to the State Government. However, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558622025 NC: 2026:KHC:37405-DB CCC No. 1094 of 2025 no action was taken on the said recommendation. The petition was disposed of with a direction to the State Government to consider the recommendation and pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to Baba Saheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Horata Samithi. 3. The learned Additional Government Advocate has filed an affidavit affirmed by the Additional Chief Secretary stating that the Department had reviewed the report submitted by the Bangalore Urban District Authorities and the selection of eligible site-less beneficiaries is required to be made by authorities such as Grama Panchayaths, Slum Development Board or the Rajiv Gandhi Rural Housing Corporation Ltd., in accordance with the Rules. He submitted that the said recommendation has been made by Tahsildar and not by any of the authorities in accordance with the law. 4. In view of the above, this Court's direction to take a decision on the recommendations has been complied. The complaint is accordingly closed. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558622025 NC: 2026:KHC:37405-DB CCC No. 1094 of 2025 5. We, however clarify that if the complainants are dissatisfied with the said response, they are not precluded from availing substantive remedies, albeit in accordance with law. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1