Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30709 (KAR)

SRI. GANESHA H.C, v. SRI. RAMESHA M.V,

CRL.RP/516/2026 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA & SMT. SOHANI HOLLA, MEMBER CRL.RP No.516/2026 (Lok Adalat No.1647/2026) BETWEEN SRI. GANESHA H.C, S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT ULUVARE VILLAGE, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 220. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. ROOPESHA B, ADVOCATE) AND SRI. RAMESHA M.V, S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT JANAKAMMA THAMMAYYANNA’S HOUSE, NEAR CHAMUNDESHWARI WATER SERVICE, GANAPATHI Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 TEMPLE ROAD, VIVEKA NAGAR, HASSAN – 573 202. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD N, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.02.2026 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.192/2024 BY THE V ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT HASSAN AND ALSO THE ORDER DATED 09.07.2024 PASSED IN C.C.NO.356/2019 BY THE VI ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HASSAN AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED/PETITIONER HEREIN FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT. THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Parties are present along with their respective counsels. 2. Joint memo is filed signed by revision petitioner, respondent and their respective counsels. 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 3 4. It is made clear that if the amount as agreed in the joint memo is not paid, accused/revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 5. It is agreed that after payment of the amount as agreed in the joint memo, sentence of imprisonment stands set aside. 6. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant/respondent under due identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MR List:2, Sl.No.53