109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1659 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.07.2026 Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1-State. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Zorawar Singh Chauhan, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed Memorandum of Appearance, which is taken on the record. 2. However, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this revision petition and intends to withdraw the same. 3. Permitted to do so. 4. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 17.07.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.07.17 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD