CRWP-8457-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH 167 CRWP-8457-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Sandeep Kaur and another …Petitioners V/S State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL) 1. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, the petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No.4 and 5. 2. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: The petitioners, who are major, solemnized marriage in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 14.07.2026. Date of birth of petitioner No.1 is stated to be 03.10.2000 and that of petitioner No.2 is 11.03.1995 as per their Aadhaar Cards and detailed marks card. It is stated that relationship of the petitioners was not approved by their parents and other family members. Respondents No.4 and 5 were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to KAPIL 2026.07.16 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8457-2026 (O&M) 2 respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Shri Muktsar Sahib seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was taken. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was received and same shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to official respondents to decide representation dated 14.07.2026 (Annexure P-7) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil criminal action initiated or to be initiated against them. 7. Disposed of accordingly. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 16.07.2026 JUDGE Kapil Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No KAPIL 2026.07.16 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document