1 CGHC010296812026 2026:CGHC:36418 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4120 of 2026 1 - Jaibhagwan Agrawal S/o Sewaram Agrawal Aged About 56 Years R/o. Banaras Chauk, Jawahar Nagar, Ambikapur, P.S., P.O. And Tahsil. Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Department, Naya Raipur, District. Raipur, C.G. 2 - Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Udaipur, District. Surguja, C.G. 4 - Tahsildar Lakhanpur District. Surguja, C.G. 5 - Aashish Kumar Kedia S/o. Jagdish Rai Kedia Aged About 42 Years R/o. School Road, Bauripara, Ambikapur, P.S. And P.O. And Tahsil. Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Abhyudhay Tripathi, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/08/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “1]That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be issued a RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to respondent no. 2 (Collector Surguja, Ambikpur) to decide file/case of petitioner and to give appropriate direction to respondent no. 4 (Tahsildar Lakhanpur) with regard to mutation of petitioner in Revenue Case No. 202501020500035/A-6/2024-25 in case of "Jaibhagwan Agrawal Vs. Aashish Kumar Kedia" within stipulated period. 2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, which it deems fit and proper.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to respondent No. 4, to decide the case of the petitioner in Revenue Case No. 202501020500035/A-6/2024-25 dated 16.01.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the case of the petitioner in Revenue Case No. 202501020500035/A-6/2024-25 dated 16.01.2025 , he is having no objection to the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondent No. 4 to 3 decide the case of the petitioner in Revenue Case No. 202501020500035/A-6/2024-25 dated 16.01.2025 in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat