Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010640142025 NC: 2026:KHC:38034-DB COMAP No. 550 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT DIVISION ADHICHUNCHANAGIRI ROAD KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570 001.
REP BY THE SRI.S.VEERASH S/O LATE P.SANNMADAPPA …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHUBHANKAR C, ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRAKANTH R GOULAY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER PANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEER DEPARTMENT SHESHADRIPURAM BENGALURU 560 020.
Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010640142025 NC: 2026:KHC:38034-DB COMAP No. 550 of 2025
3.
SRI.U. N. PADMANABHA RAO S/O LATE U NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS CLASS I PWD CONTRACTOR 20TH CROSS, GITHA NILAYA R P ROAD, NANJANGUD TOWN MYSORE DISTRICT 570 028 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K S HARISH, GA FOR R-1 & R-2)
THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1-A) OF COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.12.2020 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT MYSORE IN COM.O.S.NO.18/2020 AND TO DISMISS THE SUIT FILED IN COM OS NO.18/2020 (OS NO.113/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU) AND TO PASS SUITABLE ORDER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a
judgment and decree dated 18.12.2020 passed by the learned
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010640142025 NC: 2026:KHC:38034-DB COMAP No. 550 of 2025
Commercial Court in Com.OS.No.18/2020. The respondent No.3 (plaintiff) had filed the said suit for recovery of an amount of `38,06,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The learned Commercial Court had after examining the evidence passed the impugned judgment and decree for recovery of a sum of Rs.20,93,752.69 along with interest at 15% per annum. The
learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is liable to pay only a sum of `10,23,231/-.
2. The present appeal has been filed after a delay of 1243 days. The appellant has filed an application seeking condonation of delay, stating that the delay in filing the appeal is "for want of proper knowledge, liability and other factors, which requires reconsideration". The appellant also submits that he had sent communications to higher authority for action to be taken and has filed the present appeal based on the recent communication.
3. Clearly, there is no sufficient cause that prevented the appellant from filing the appeal within the stipulated time.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010640142025 NC: 2026:KHC:38034-DB COMAP No. 550 of 2025
4. In view of the above, the application, IA No.1/2026 seeking condonation of delay of 1243 days in filing the present appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed.
5. Pending application stands disposed of.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5