Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3068 (PNJ)

PRISHITA GULATI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5130/2026 · 2026-05-01

Sumeet Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP CRWP CRWP CRWP----5130 5130 5130 5130---- 138 138 138 138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Prishita Gulati State of Punjab Date of Date of Date of Date of DDDDecision: ecision: ecision: ecision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL Constitution of India, the the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent Nos. 2. respondents). 3. Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 4. against the wishes of the family members/ 5. relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner ----2026 2026 2026 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRWP CRWP CRWP CRWP----5130 5130 5130 5130----2026 2026 2026 2026 Prishita Gulati and another versus Punjab and others ecision: ecision: ecision: ecision: May 01 May 01 May 01 May 01, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: May 01 May 01 May 01 May 01, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 10. Notice of motion only to respondents Nos. 1 to respondents). On the asking of the Court, Mr. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on the wishes of private respondent Nos. members/ relatives of petitioner No. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2026 2026 2026 2026 ....Petitioners ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioners. By way of present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of to respondents Nos. 1 to 3 (i.e. official Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on 28.04.2026 respondent Nos.4 to 10, who happen to be No.1. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.01 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRWP CRWP CRWP CRWP----5130 5130 5130 5130----2026 2026 2026 2026 2222 No.1-Prishita Gulati is 07.06.2002 and petitioner No.2-Pratham Mehra is 23.08.2001. 6. Without commenting on legality and validity of the marriage as also merits of the contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Commissioner of Police, Amritsar Rural) to look into representation dated 28.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass an appropriate order thereupon within two weeks from today. 7. Liberty is reserved in favour of the private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. 8. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. 9. The petition stands disposed of. 10. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE May 01 May 01 May 01 May 01, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.01 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment