Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3068 (PAT)

Bhutun Bind @ Bhutun Bindu @ Bhutun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./26085/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26085 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2025 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bhutun Bind @ Bhutun Bindu @ Bhutun Kumar Son of Badan Bind @ Ram Badan Bind Resident of Village- Magajpura P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, 75 liters illicit liquor, kept in sacks, was recovered from Panari (Panihari) Ghat. Apprehended co-accused Ramakant Prasad disclosed the name of the petitioner and co-accused Jagan Bind that they fled away from the spot. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that petitioner has no concern with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26085 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Except the disclosure statement of co-accused, there is nothing material against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Court No. 1, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T