Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30670 (PAT)

Ashok Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3821/2026 · 2026-01-28

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3821 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2025 Thana- BEN P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ashok Yadav Son of Ramjee Yadav R/o Village - Khaira, P.S. - Ben, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Ben P.S. Case no.237 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on a video being viral wherein one person was shown wielding two kattas/pistols, it is stated that a raid was conducted. On enquiry from the person namely Md. Shyam Alam, who was wielding the katta, it is stated that he disclosed that he had got the same from the petitioner and one another co- accused. It is further stated that on a raid being conducted, on the house of the co-accused Azad Kumar, a katta was recovered from his house. However, on a raid being conducted in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3821 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 house of the petitioner, the petitioner was found absconded and no incriminating article was recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Even as per the allegations in the FIR, there is no material against the petitioner except the statement of the co-accused Md. Shyam Alam made before police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession who has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner’s possession and the only material against the petitioner being the statement of co-accused Md. Shyam Alam made before police together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Ben P.S. Case no.237 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3821 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned I/C J.M. 1st, Nalanda at Biharsharif. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T