HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17684 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Amar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Ms. Vatsala, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 2. At the very out set, Ms. Vatsala pointed out that petitioner is not the person aggrieved rather petition is in the nature of PIL, therefore, it may be dismissed as not maintainable. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file PIL. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 5. So far as liberty is concerned, it is always open to the petitioner to approach competent forum for which no permission is required. May 6, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Tiwari, Rishi Kant Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vatsala (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digvijay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad