Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30654 (CHH)

M/S SHRI ASHUTOSH STRUCTURES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/2645/2022 · 2026-08-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:27583 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2645 of 2022 M/s Shri Ashutosh Structures Pvt. Ltd. (Previous Name Shri Ashutosh Engineering Industries) Through Director Haldhari Lal Vyas, S/o Late Mr. Gopal Lal Vyas Aged About 58 Years, R/o H. No 5, Krishna Nagar, Daganiya Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001, India. 2 - Regional P.F. Commissioner - Ii (Cc-Ii) Block D, Scheme - 32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492004. 3 - State Bank Of India Commercial Branch Raipur, 2nd Floor Pujari Chambers, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pin 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent No.1 : None For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Swapnil Thawaney, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.R.Patankar, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.04 12:31:40 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 03.07.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in two rounds. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents, are present. 3. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh