Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3065 (ORI)

PRADYUMNA KUMAR DAS v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/4131/2026 · 2026-02-06

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.4131 of 2026 Pradyumna Kumar Das …. Petitioner Mr. P.R. Barik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha, represented through its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Nayak, AGA CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 6.2.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. P.R. Barik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Nayak, learned AGA for State – opposite parties. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that Udala NAC is now proceeding for eviction of the petitioner without granting him any opportunity of hearing. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Executive Officer, Udala NAC (O.P. No.5) to grant due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and take decision, in accordance with law, before proceeding for his eviction from the case land, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition. Till such decision is taken by O.P. No.5, the petitioner may not be evicted from the case land. 4. An urgent certified copy of this order shall be issued on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda