CRWP-8233-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (110 ) KAJAL AND ANR STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sumit Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Apoorv Garg, A **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. petitioners at the hands of respondents No. representation dated 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her par relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 14.07.2026 KAJAL AND ANR Versus HARYANA AND ORS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sumit Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the at the hands of respondents No.4 to entation dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P-3 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her par relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 09.07.2026 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-8233-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.07.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sumit Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners AG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing 3 to protect the life and liberty of the to 11 and take action on their 3). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.14 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-8233-2026 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this directed to supply the copy of the petition to h 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 Kurukshetra to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. It petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. 14.07.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (1) Notice of motion. r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts notice on stage. The petitioners’ counsel is im. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.14 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.