Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30615 (KAR)

SRI RAKESH v. SRI NAGARAJ

WP/30254/2024 · 2026-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625162024 NC: 2026:KHC:37745 WP No. 30254 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 30254 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. RAKESH, S/O. LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.104, 80 FEET ROAD, MARIYAPPANAPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 056. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.R.RAJASHEKHARAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAGARAJ, S/O. LATE REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 2. SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, S/O. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.350, 2ND CROSS, JAGAJYOTHI LAYOUT, NAGADEVANAHALLI, JANNABHARATHI POST, BENGALURU - 560 056. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625162024 NC: 2026:KHC:37745 WP No. 30254 of 2024 3. SRI. VAJRAPPA, S/O. KENCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT PAPANNANA THOTA, NAYANDAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 039. 4. SMT. K. NAGARATHNAMMA, W/O. SRI. VAJRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT PAPANNANA THOTA, NAYANDAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 039. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BALAGANGADHAR G.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; NOTICE TO R4 IS HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 07.01.2025) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) QUASH THE COMMON ORDER, DATED 16.10.2024 PASSED BY THE XXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH NO. 6), ON I.A. NOS.17 TO 19 AND ALSO SEPARATE ORDER ALSO DATED 16.10.2024 MADE ON I.A. NO.20, IN .O.S. NO.6066/2011 ON HER FILE VIDE ANNEXURES - A AND B TO THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625162024 NC: 2026:KHC:37745 WP No. 30254 of 2024 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4