MANDAR MADHUKAR PATOLE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/2935/2026 · 2026-07-27
Shri Gautam A Ankhad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3061 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3061 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 26-wp-2935-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2935 OF 2026 Dr.Mandar Madhukar Patole … Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …… Mr.Shailesh Chavan for the Petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, Addl.PP for the Respondent -State. …...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE : 27 JULY, 2026 P.C.:
1. A dispute is brewing between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 4, wife. There are several cases pending before the Family Court and the M.M. Courts at Borivali and Vikhroli, as well as domestic violence cases before the Courts at Borivali and Bandra.
2. We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner husband, who is a medical practitioner. Trupti S. Bamne TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2026.07.28 10:34:12 +0530
2 26-wp-2935-2026.odt
3. The Petitioner desires that an FIR be registered. We expressed our disinclination.
4. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on instructions, that the Petitioner would approach the appropriate forum under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS, 2023). The Petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this Petition.
5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.
6. If the Petitioner approaches the appropriate forum under Section 175(3) of the BNSS 2023, the concerned authority would follow the due procedure laid down in law.
7. All contentions of all the stakeholders are kept open.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Trupti S. Bamne