Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30600 (PAT)

Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary @ Ramakant Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./1088/2026 · 2026-01-28

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1088 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- BHAIROGANJ District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary @ Ramakant Mandal Son of Late Lalparikhan Patel Resident of Ward No. 4, Village- Shivrajpur, Padarkhap Panchayat, P.S.- Bhairoganj, Bagaha, District - West Champaran. 2. Prabhakar Patel @ Prbhakar Patel Son of Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary @ Ramakant Mandal, Resident of Ward No. 4, Village- Shivrajpur, Padarkhap Panchayat, P.S.- Bhairoganj, Bagaha, District - West Champaran. 3. Diwakar Patel Son of Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary @ Ramakant Mandal Resident of Ward No. 4, Village- Shivrajpur, Padarkhap Panchayat, P.S.- Bhairoganj, Bagaha, District - West Champaran. 4. Chandan Patel Son of Diwakar Patel Resident of Ward No. 4, Village- Shivrajpur, Padarkhap Panchayat, P.S.- Bhairoganj, Bagaha, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Vatsal Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 191 and 190 of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant’s side to forcibly disposes her from her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1088 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 land. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute, simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and case and counter-case, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bhairoganj (Bagaha) P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025, subject to condition as laid Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1088 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T