Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30600 (KAR)

BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI v. MR SAYEED

WP/12709/2020 · 2026-07-23

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010233912020 NC: 2026:KHC:38135 WP No. 12709 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 12709 OF 2020 (GM-PP) BETWEEN: BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI (BANKI MASJID), DODDAPET BEHIND VEGETABLE MARKET KOLAR-563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SWATHI ASHOK.,ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. MR SAYEED S/O MOHAMMED SIRAJ AHMED AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SHOP NO.22 BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI (BANKI MASJID), DODDAPET BEHIND VEGETABLE MARKET KOLAR-563 101. 2. THE COMPETENT OFFICER / UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS) ACT,1974 AND ADDL. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DARUL AWAQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU-560 052. …RESPONDENTS (V/O DATED 16.07.2024, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010233912020 NC: 2026:KHC:38135 WP No. 12709 of 2020 R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN NO.PP/07/KLR/2017 AND MISC. APPEAL NO.27/2019; QUASH THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2020 PASSED IN MISC. APPEAL NO.27/2019 BY THE 1ST ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AT KOLAR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER 1. Vide order dated 10.07.2026 this Court has passed the following order; "1. None appears for the petitioners. 2. Order sheet indicate that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even on the late date of hearing. 3. Matter is adjourned to 23.07.2026 for further orders on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the Karnataka State Legal Services Committee. 4. It is made clear that, if there is no representation on the next date of hearing, appropriate order including dismissal of the petition would be passed." 2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner. This would indicate that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter and the matter is pending since 2020. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010233912020 NC: 2026:KHC:38135 WP No. 12709 of 2020 3. In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3