Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3060 (CHH)

SMT. GITA SHUKLA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1670/2026 · 2026-02-11

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:7870 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1670 of 2026 Smt. Gita Shukla W/o Narayan Shukla Aged About 44 Years Lecturer (Nagri Nikay) At Devkinandan Girls Higher Secondary School Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, R/o Naya Sarkanda, Jabdapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralay, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Panchayat Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Saxena, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 2 / 3 12.02.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Direction/circular 25.07.2019 issued by the Director, Directorate of Panchayat. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to consider the counting of services of the petitioner from the initial date of appointment 14.01.2011 for absorption in school education department from 2019 and grant seniority from the initial date of appointment. 10.3 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to give any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner as per the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to respondent no. 3 and 4 to consider and take decision on pending representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within a specified time frame. Petitioner may also be permitted to submit fresh representation to be considered by concerned respondent authorities along with pending representation. 3. Learned counsel for State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at 3 / 3 this stage, permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation before respondent no. 3 and 4 and if such representation is submitted then respondent authorities shall consider and take decision on representation to be submitted by petitioner along with pending representation, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza