Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 306 (PNJ)

SANDEEP @ VICKY v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/16888/2026 · 2026-03-27

Aaradhna Sawhney

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRM-M-16888-2026 Date of decision: 27.03.2026 Sandeep @ Vicky ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present : Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.L. Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.(ORAL) 1. Admittedly, FIR has not been registered in the present case till date and the present petition has been instituted at a premature stage. In case, cognizable offence is made out, police authorities are directed to issue notice of 3 days. 2. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of with aforesaid directions. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 27.03.2026 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2026.03.27 20:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document