Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30596 (PAT)

Sonu Yadav @ Raushan Yadav @ Sonu Kumar @ Raushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./1850/2026 · 2026-01-29

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1850 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Sonu Yadav @ Raushan Yadav @ Sonu Kumar @ Raushan Kumar S/o- Arjun Yadav R/v- Maniyara Ps- Wazirganj Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 333, 279, 186, 353, 379, 411, 420, 216 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that when the police party stopped some tractors from illegally carrying sand and demanded challan, three motorcycle borne persons protested and assaulted them while the drivers of the said tractors fled away and only one driver was apprehended, who disclosed the name of petitioner and others. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1850 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/2 confessional statement of co-accused, who was apprehended on spot. Similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench, vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 38066 of 2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific allegation against him and he along with other co-accused assaulted police party with intention to commit death. Several police personnel sustained injuries. 6. Considering the nature of allegation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T