KUPPUSWAMY KUMARESAN, v. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 1 (FAC),
WP/19232/2026 · 2026-06-08
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30596 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30596 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 19232 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19232 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.20507 & 20510 of 2026 Kuppuswamy Kumaresan, Proprietor of Kumaran Theatre, No.364, Mount Madipakkam Main Road, Ullagaram, Kancheepuram – 600091. ..Petitioner Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 (FAC), Nanganallur Assessment Circle, No.571, Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department (South Tower),Room No.224, 2nd Floor, Anna salai,Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of Respondent
in
impugned
assessment
order
in
GSTIN 33AKZPK8528N1Z6/2019-20 dated 23.08.2024 and in Reference No.
ZD3308242159853 in GSTIN/ID 33AKZPK8528N1Z6 dated 23.08.2024 for the F.Y.2019-20, and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19232 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr. M.Senthilkumar For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax)
ORDER An order dated 23.08.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.
2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.
4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19232 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 08-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 (FAC), Nanganallur Assessment Circle, No.571, Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department (South Tower),Room No.224, 2nd Floor, Anna salai,Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19232 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 19232 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.20507 & 20510 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis