Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30595 (KAR)

SRI.M. MUNIKATAPPA v. SRI MURALI KRISHNA N

CRL.RP/1470/2025 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA & SMT. SOHANI HOLLA, MEMBER CRL.RP No.1470/2025 (Lok Adalat No.1798/2026) BETWEEN SRI. M.MUNIKATAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.13, ERAPPA GARDEN, AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 047. ...PETITIONER (By Sri. PARAMESWARAPPA C, ADVOCATE) AND SRI. MURALI KRISHNA N S/O LATE N. NAGABHUSHANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15, 2ND CROSS, AYYAPPA TEMPLE BLOCK, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 047. …RESPONDENTS (By SRI. VISWESWARAIAH S, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF BNSS R/W SECTION 397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 23.01.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XIV ACJM, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU IN CC.NO.54352/2023, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I ACT, 1881 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.08.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT (CCH-75) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.APPEAL NO.25075/2025 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Parties are present along with their respective counsels. 2. Joint memo is filed signed by revision petitioner and respondent and their respective counsels. 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that if the amount as agreed in the joint memo is not paid, accused/revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 3 5. It is agreed that after payment of the amount as agreed in the joint memo, sentence of imprisonment stands set aside. 6. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant/respondent under due identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MR List:2, Sl.No.22