Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30585 (CHH)

YOGESH DHANKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10140/2019 · 2026-08-19

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010385002019 2026:CGHC:37400 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10140 of 2019 1 - Yogesh Dhankar, S/o. Shri Ful Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Working as District Social Audit Faciliter, and Posted at Kanker, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Anil Lahre, S/o. Hira Ram Lahre, Aged About 25 Years, Working as District Social Audit Faciliter, and Posted at Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Pushpakant Pradhan, S/o. Gajanand Pradhan, Aged About 25 Years, Working as District Social Audit Faciliter, and Posted at Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Director, Chhattisgarh Social Audit Unit, Panchayat And Rural Development, HDD-41, Vidhayak Colony, Behind 36 City Shopping Malll, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.08.20 15:05:20 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 20.08.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the representation of the petitioners i.e. Annexure P-1 has not been considered and decided by the respondent authorities. 2. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioners i.e. Annexures P-1, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. 3. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok Judge