Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3057 (BOM)

SHOBHA SURESH DAGALE v. Abhijit Goel

CP/112/2026 · 2026-08-06

Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

47-CP-112-2026-IN-WP-13511-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.112 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13511 OF 2016 Shobha Suresh Dagale ...Petitioner V/s. Abhijit Goel, Municipal Commissioner, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation, Kalyan and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.D.V.Deokar i/b. Mr.Sadik Pathan, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rao, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3–Corporation. Mr.P.P.Kakade, Addl.G.P. a/w Smt.P.B.Chavan, AGP, for Respondents –State. ***** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 6th AUGUST 2026 P. C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The order which is breached has been complied with substantially. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, however, submits that there is some dispute about amount of gratuity. We grant liberty to the Satish Sangar 1/2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.08.06 20:16:58 +0530 47-CP-112-2026-IN-WP-13511-2016.doc Petitioner to make a representation to the Respondent No.1– Corporation pointing out the reason for the shortfall and the calculations. If such a representation is preferred, the Respondent No.1–Corporation to look into the said representation and take a decision thereon expeditiously. 3. The Petition is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Satish Sangar 2/2